Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:57

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
watchOS 26 preview: 5 new Apple Watch features I can’t wait to try - Tom's Guide
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Unclear if rock bottom, but Braves hit it anyway in 11-10 stunner loss - Battery Power
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Is it wise to choose your family over your honor?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How does a 45-year-old man get a girlfriend?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What to Watch: Barbara Walters Documentary, LEGO Masters Build Batmobiles and More - TVLine
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Exclusive | Kimberly-Clark Nears Roughly $3.5 Billion Sale of International Tissue Business - WSJ